. And because some of Patricias advocates have suggested Andrew Katrinak had a motive for murder, I checked into whether he had a life insurance payout to gain upon Joanns demise. Rather, Im conservative when it comes to potential disagreement with the jury: I wasnt there to see/hear evidence and to declare theyre wrong! Patricia has been wrongfully convicted of murdering Joann and Alex Katrinak in 1994. That, as well as measurements of the babys head (revealing the infant to be of a more advanced age) very much suggest they were killed some considerable time after what was believed at her trial. in tandem with no evidence of home invasion. Your somewhat convoluted explanation of discuss and express opinion, seems to ramble on and on without any logic or reason. so then using your contention, one who is deeply religious and sees God as being a factual figure is wrong? It was winter which are cold in PA and would slow down decomposition and minimize insect activity although you are correct about the rodentswhy were there none? Joanns gun and beating wounds were obvious, but the baby died a less violent (but just as horrible) death with no clear signs. Thus Im confident shes the perp probably mentally disturbed at the time (the thought of her rationally, coolly killing her babies is too horrible), though probably not to the standard for criminal mitigation. And the fact that Patricia called Andrew even after he married someone else didnt mean she was still carrying a torch for him, according to one of her friends. I hope and pray the cops and the husband will finally do the right thing. Claps! There is way too much doubt in this case for my comfort. DNA also doesnt lie. Charles Robert, the 3-month-old son she had with Gary Gabard, died of sudden infant death syndrome; Patricia found him blue in his crib. That poor child who grew up with no mom for absolutely no reason. Too bad she got off with just a life sentence. I would suggest you take the time to read the book or, at least watch the documentaries which STICK TO THE FACTS, and then comment. Killers can plan all the details and alibis well ahead of the murder while cops must come up with hard evidence, even just to make an arrest. This woman was not innocent, but she is very good at manipulating people into feeling sorry for her. If Rorrer is innocent, she is a victim of a terrible miscarriage (terrible relatively because she is regarded as a child-killer and has been incarcerated for a many years) which I hope is corrected as soon as possible. One of Patricia's alibis was that she was at a bar on the night of the abduction. The Free Patricia Rorrer page responds to comments from supporters (How is this even possible that this woman is still in jail?!? Joann would have fought for her life the person that did this would have had marks on them from a fight! They theorize that Andrew Katrinak framed Patricia and that the hostile phone call between Patricia and Joann actually took place not on Dec. 12 as Andrew said but rather on Dec. 7. How so? Patricia Rorrer was a cold woman. What evidence is there she actually left the state? One of Patricia's alibis was that she was at a bar on the night of the abduction. On December 12, 1994, Joann answered a phone call from a woman shed never met, Patricia Rorrer, her husbands onetime girlfriend. Its true that women were more idiots than about men, they had the impression that if they caught a fool to take them as wives, they would settle for life, even today we see that but more diluted, still an exaggerated reason for murder. Theyre more than happy to exaggerate and speculate the details of the crime, which serves to attract more viewers who (like you) seem to be happy to believe it all. State police and the Philadelphia division of the FBI appealed to the public for leads. Above, we have another whos totally clueless, has little or no knowledge of this case, but is happy to display his/her ignorance with a rant based on limited knowledge learned from biased documentaries who thinks that by using offensive and insulting language itll influence those who support Rorrer into changing their opinions. If you have ever met or been in a relationship with a narcissist, the former partner being with a more young and attractive-looking person would make them go off. She likely SUFFOCATED him to get revenge on the babys father who was planning on leaving her. WoW! You are not expressing an opinion but making an assertion or claim of fact: [I] have absolutely no doubt she was railroaded and wrongfully convicted. You are claiming innocence as fact there is no doubt shes innocent. That documentary points out that, despite the bodies of the two victims supposedly being exposed for several months, their condition remained relatively undisturbed by weather or animal activity. Police theorize she owned the gun, but its neither here nor there whether she used a particular gun to kill and would make sense (to a wise perp) that the gun couldnt be linked to her by past activity. They retested the hair for DNA evidence with updated technology definitely Patricias hair case closed. Locked up. Your comment could not be farther than the truth! State: Oklahoma. Patricia had a violent past and was absolutely positively the killer. Joanne didnt go missing until December 15, an entire week and a day later. It says that Andrew Katrinak passed his lie detector test. Police slowly built a case against Patricia. Shes attracted the help of writer Tammy Mal (full name Tammy Malinowski OReilly), author of Convenient Suspect, a book about the case. From my point of view, the American police investigations are first hand, and often very poorly done, Ive only seen worse in the British police, which is paradoxical given the laudatory talent of both nationalities, but it is a Scandinavian saying: bigger the mouth, smaller the facts. Highly charged case. All of them returned without a DNA analysis because they contained no root material. And your attempt to draw a distinction between a fact and an opinion! Stevie J Further to my previous comment, I should add the following. And remnants of what look like a baby rested on the mother. They would have no reason to protect Andrew and lie on her. Nobody said bodies were intact. Dance defense. And the obvious answer is not as you claim. Both were deceased. Very similar. Patricia Rorrer Self - Suspect (archive footage) Director Kimberley Ferdinando All cast & crew Production, box office & more at IMDbPro Storyline Edit Keith Morrison investigates the horrific 1994 murders of Joann Katrinak and her infant son, Alex, as well as the ongoing claims that Patricia Rorrer was wrongfully convicted of the murders. The phone wire was located at the opposite end of the basement, which was dark. Have you watched any of the documentaries Ive mentioned? (We didnt get into the specifics.). Her mother, Patricia Chambers, provided day care for their baby son, Charles. They retested hair from the car in 2008 with updated new technology. How would an intruder find it? Or the fact the one of those officers heard her make this statement at the time of her arrest and not the other. Youre so fixated with her guilt, youre unable to see other factors that show this case to be a disgraceful travesty. She failed miserably to convince me, or anyone else who mattered, of her innocence.. Sir I would not kill somebody and I definitely wouldnt kill somebody I never met, Rorrer said. Murder in Lehigh Valley: Keith Morrison Reports is also available on YouTube, but it costs $1.99 to view (Keith comes off as an advocate for Patricias innocence on the episode). (McIntyre said that Egan ignored Traupman because he was a nut who said that the man he saw arguing with the woman in a car was Hispanic but wearing a fake mustache and a toupee. Having watched and read all that has been available, I feel very strongly, that a grave error has been perpetrated by the law authorities. If they were unable to get a DNA reading the first time, why the need for a second examination? Probably by the jeans and the boots. Patricia Lynne Rorrer made for a good suspect. . So where they alive somewhere, and if so how could of Patricia, who was questioned, with not one mark on her kill them? False. In April 1995, the family buried Joann and Alex in a single bronze casket after a funeral mass at a Bethlehem church. She was always looking for a fight, Gary Gabard told the Morning Call, which noted that he was a head shorter than Patricia. She didnt kill those two boys and TX knows, but they made too much noise about it, hence this is probably the real reason that Darlie hasnt been put to death 24-25 yrs later. After Joann Katrinak, the wife of Patricias former flame, turned up dead along with her infant son, prosecutors suspected Patricia. Are you even aware there are judges, eminent writers, lawyers and TV personalities and countless other ordinary people all of whom steadfastly support her as being innocent and wrongly convicted. The article also notes that most inmates earn around 19 cent an hour at their jobs and must pay $5 each time they need medical attention or medicine. Whoever writes this amateurish swill should get a real life, andsa real job. The attorney, Craig Neely, also argues he has the testimony of a. Im quite happy to accept that ANYONE who makes a TV documentary makes it for money. That is not just a circumstantial case, that is both circumstantial and forensic, and it is pretty air tight. No way for 4 months, that deceased baby would still be resting across the mothers chest. 51min. And the point the hair in her hand wasnt tested was because they didnt need it since they had the killer shame on everyone who went along with that. Having read that and your most recent comment above, its clearly obvious youre a person of high educational standing and legal knowledge, which I fully respect. The author that wrote the book on the Rutier case donates all the funds from that book to freeing Darlie Routier because the jury wasnt shown a lot of evidence of the medical issues Darlie suffered. Any subsequent proof emerging and then revealed in a book or documentary is surely something that should be taken seriously and investigated if necessary. His father confirmed his alibi that they were doing construction work together, putting an addition on the house of friends Tom and Kathy Holschwander, at the time of Joanns disappearance. Notify me of follow-up comments by email. Pat had a string of bad relationships in her past and was not happy. Joanns first husband, New Jersey construction worker Michael Jack, who had reportedly abused her during their marriage, also had a solid alibi. But because there is no author of this page, I would like you to contact me on the Free Patricia Rorrer facebook page. Since then our team has proven that Patricia is innocent. Chris and Fatima investigate the case of Patricia Rorrer, who is in prison for brutally murdering her former boyfriend's wife and baby out of spite; her lawyers claim that she was .
Best Shelling On Sanibel Island, Example Of Ontological Moral Dilemma, Carrier Dome Renovation, Car Accident Bass Highway Today, Articles P
Best Shelling On Sanibel Island, Example Of Ontological Moral Dilemma, Carrier Dome Renovation, Car Accident Bass Highway Today, Articles P